Ghibli by hyung86

The great Animation debate: Ghibli versus Disney

Disney is a universal brand, a timeless reflection back to our youth, brimming with fond memories of cinema trips and cosy nights in with the family. Tales of traditionally perfect Princesses, talking animals and sing-along-songs. The companies ability to hold a special place in the hearts of each generation for almost a century is admirable. So, why is Studio Ghibli, the Japanese counterpart for the East, so much more?

For those who do not know of Studio Ghibli, it was founded in 1985, around 62 years after its fair-to-say rival, Disney. The Japanese company has created over 20 beautiful animated feature films to date, with their own array of wonderfully crafted heroes and heroines.

The two animation giants undoubtedly share similar traits, their work is utterly timeless and adored globally. However, it is a belief shared by many that the East began to take over the West when it came to quality animation, and there are a fair few reasons why Studio Ghibli will always surpass Disney.

Growing up, I watched both Disney and Studio Ghibli films, and the latter continues to move me as I edge towards my mid-twenties (a scary prospect). The heart of Studio Ghibli stems from its animation team, especially from the creative brain of the former lead director, Hayao Miyazaki, who created something with a far deeper moralistic and feminist meaning.

Ghibli Posters

Why are strong female leads so important in animation?

Like many, I found myself learning far more from Studio Ghibli, with their tales of female struggle and empowerment (most films tend to have a strong female lead). Unlike the Disney Princesses, the heroines are relatable without the patronising undertone and the magic and depth of their fantasy tales awakens the attention of adults, as well as presenting important moral dilemmas and messages for children watching.

Looking at the female leads in Disney films (predominantly the Disney Princesses) in comparison to those in Studio Ghibli, a striking difference will continuously manifest itself. Time and time again in Disney, it will be seen that these princesses are overtly defenseless without the men in their lives to rescue them (Mulan, Merida and the new Princess Moana being the few exceptions).

Compare this to Studio Ghibli, and you will find feminist icons in abundance,  the majority of Ghibli films have an admirable and strong female lead. Miyazaki says:

“Many of my movies have strong female leads – brave, self-sufficient girls that don’t think twice about fighting for what they believe in with all their heart. They’ll need a friend, or a supporter, but never a savior. Any woman is just as capable of being a hero as any man.”

Not relying on a man (or anyone for that matter) is a recurring theme, everyone is seen as equal in the gender Olympic’s and this is just wonderful for the self-esteem of a small child, who doesn’t love feeling empowered and equal?

WHY is female empowerment needed IN ANIMATION?

An example of utter reliance on men is presented to us in The Little Mermaid (Disney). Our leading mermaid, Ariel, plays centre-stage under the sea, she is beautiful, feisty and terribly naive. Of course, she falls head-over-heels for the ‘wrong’ guy in the opinion of her father, whom she then desperately seeks out upon the land in exchange for her voice. He notices her, but not enough to avoid being bewitched and ensnared by a witch. Says it all but a happy ending is guaranteed, this is Disney.

old-sophie-howls-moving-castle

Compare this with female protagonist Sophie of Howl’s Moving Castle (Studio Ghibli), and you are presented with a self-conscious wallflower. Sophie is plain and unnoticed, obviously reinforced as viewers see that even her own mother fails to realise her transformation from a young girl into a twisted hag. This ordinary girl, no ‘beauty’ on her side, must seek out a wizard whose attention she had caught in her youthful state. The issue being that she cannot speak a word to anyone about the curse and therefore must lurk around until she can figure out how to break it herself, while her wizarding companion is on a quest to find himself also.

There is far more depth to Sophie, she’s opinionated, brash and stern (probably something to do with the aged state and being utterly fed up). Whereas Ariel is presented as emotionally motivated and stroppy, only seeking her happiness as an end goal and caring little for the loss of those around her (particularly her somewhat overbearing father who is terrified about her disappearance). On the other hand, Sophie seeks to help all those around her, she is a complex character whose love and compassion motivates her throughout, perhaps even at her own expense and happiness at times.

The problem with Disney is that helplessness, ‘love’ and beauty define the Princesses. With Studio Ghibli, beauty isn’t key, the female leads are admired for their strength, journey, and powerful hearts. It is a stark and reoccurring difference, just select any Disney or Studio Ghibli film.

Some critics argue that Studio Ghibli films exploit these young heroines. However, It would seem that the consensus argues that Ghibli, in fact, challenges girls to solve their own problems. Saying this, modern Disney appears to have approached this too with ‘stronger’ characters such as Mulan and Merida, to name a few. In contrast, Studio Ghibli has been doing this with his characters since day one, in a culture often perplexed by such dominating female empowerment.

Another perk is that Studio Ghibli animations provide far more cultural exploration for us Westerners and prove themselves to be culturally apt. Whereas Disney often fails to truly embrace the cultures of their Princesses in their locality.

Often you will hear of Disneyland being the ‘most magical place on earth’, its stories the basis for this magic. I argue that Studio Ghibli offers far more magic, it teaches us to be kind, to not judge, to respect and cherish our environment (nature being of great religious importance to the Japanese), that pacifism can work and childhood transitioning is tough, no one can save you from it but you.

Their stories are creative, with complex and challenging storylines, developed and iconic characters, heartwarming and meaningful messages, embellished with beautiful animation. Studio Ghibli will remain timeless to its audience, holding many an animated heart for a lifetime with their emotion invoking work. The core and important message will stay the same, despite your gender, appearance, size or background, you can achieve anything you want to, and this is why Studio Ghibli will always surpass Disney.

Does your heart remain with Disney or Studio Ghibli? What is your favourite Ghibli film?

Stephanie xox

Please follow me on Twitter | Instagram | Facebook for more updates from The LDN Gal

tumblr_nxslieOb3W1sn0z5fo1_500-vert

After attacks across the world this past week, many are left in a harrowing and mournful state.

The focal point and centre of attention amidst all this crisis, were the Parisian attacks, in which as many as 129 people were killed and more than 300 injured after three groups of armed men rampaged the French capital last Friday.

In light of this coverage, many are rightfully angered that the Middle East was clearly not represented enough in comparison, a disparity of coverage was quite evident.

Devastation and attacks were seen also with ISIS bombings killing 43 in Beirut and 26 in Baghdad, among countless other cities falling victim to relentless terrorist attacks, igniting the belief that ‘are some tragedies more tragic that others?’

This was illustrated dramatically when Facebook opted not to add a ‘Safety Check‘ to these Middle Eastern locations although its use was prominent in France, the feature enabling those in areas of tragedy to mark themselves as safe, making their family and friends aware.

These actions have led to huge debates online and across the media. Facebook founder, Mark Zuckerberg, has since promised to enable the Safety Check feature more following these accusations of a ‘Western bias‘, saying: “we care about all people equally, and we will work hard to help people suffering in as many of these situations as we can.”

However, despite these selective actions of social conglomerates, this should not mean that the people within Europe (and globally) should be penalised for mourning their losses, or any losses for that matter.

It is ludicrous that in a crisis, people are being shamed for their solidarity and unification in a crisis. This is about death, death close to home and, of course, all lives matter.

Further accusations of ‘Western bias’ and ‘selective grief’ erupted as the social media website offered its users the ability to change their profile picture to a French flag overlay. Most on Facebook inclined, I did so myself.

Many an opinion piece has circulated the internet, with a fair few condemning the changing of profile pictures to represent the French, seen by some as a portrayal of jumping on a bandwagon of ‘corporate white supremacy‘, so to speak.

I am not French of course, I do not claim to be and I do not have family living in France. But, like many other Britons, I holiday in France, a ‘tourist’ within Paris often, and I have a great affection for the city. France is, after all, my neighboring country, I am European.

The atmosphere in my home city of Oxford the following morning after the widespread attacks was somber, with the minute silence yesterday being undeniably and widely respected across the UK.

Of course, I reiterate that all lives are equal, matter and should be represented as such. A degree of ignorance does remain, and we must remain vigilant, respectful and unified to the ongoing terrors worldwide. To all those affected by ongoing global crisis, I offer my deepest sympathy, no one should ever feel unsafe.

Let us hope that the tragedies of the paris attcks last week will continue to unify, and those whose voices reach the furthest will promote a more global and respectful representation in the future.